At CanoLAB Saskatoon, Gary Peng from AAFC showed these photos from clubroot trials in Quebec. Clubroot resistant (R), moderately susceptible (MS) and susceptible (S) canola varieties were grown on clubroot infested soil on rotations that ranged from continuous canola to canola every 5 years. The photos show how rotation, especially for MS and S varieties, improves yield. Rotation also plays an important role for growers relying on R varieties in clubroot infested fields. Short rotations using resistant varieties will select quickly for clubroot pathotypes that are not controlled by the genetic resistance. This can rapidly eliminate the value of the resistance trait on those fields, which is a situation that has already been experienced in canola and cole crops around the world.
Home / Canola Watch / Rotation’s role in clubroot management
Related Articles
Clubroot R breakdown: Preliminary results from 2014 survey
Stephen Strelkov with the University of Alberta tested soil samples from 27 fields in Alberta that were seeded to resistant varieties in 2014 and showed more than expected levels of…
Clubroot: Management steps for infested land
Clubroot has been found in 18 Alberta counties and it spreads every year. See the 2010 clubroot map at the bottom of this article. Growers have clubroot-resistant varieties to choose…
Clubroot shift and crop rotation
Discovery of a different clubroot pathotype in central Alberta will change the rotation plans for some growers. No current varieties have resistance to this different pathotype, and varieties with a…
Clubroot pathogen shift: Management
In 2013, an Alberta field was identified where a clubroot resistant variety showed a high incidence of clubroot infection. Subsequent testing by the University of Alberta indicated that all current…