Canola Council


Canola Watch

2004 Canola Watch Reports

Canola Watch Report No. 17
Western Canada – August 18, 2004

In this issue (click the bookmark links below to move to specific sections of this report):
Crop development
| Frost | Insects | Fusarium wilt | Sclerotinia | Field scouting | Swathing/Assessing seed colour change | Pre-harvest glyphosate

The Alberta Canola Producers Commission (ACPC) has developed an Alberta focused version of this report. Visit the ACPC website at: http://www.canola.ab.ca

Crop development remains variable across most of the Prairies. Manitoba continued to experience cool conditions this past week, which hampered crop advancement. Some early seeded fields have been swathed, but there are concerns that many of these fields may have been swathed too early. Many later seeded fields remain in the latter half of the bloom stage. Most areas in Saskatchewan are well into pod development, with only the odd late seeded field still in bloom. Dry conditions in central areas near Davidson and Watrous have caused the crop to advance more rapidly. Some swathing has started south of Regina near Yellow Grass, but concerns remain that many of these fields have been swathed too early. Overall, crop development in Saskatchewan is rated at 10 to 21 days behind normal. Swathing is not expected to become general for another 10 to 14 days. In southern Alberta, swathing is quite general with up to 30% complete. Combining is expected to begin by the end of this week in some areas near Medicine Hat. In central Alberta, pod development is advancing, with only the odd late seeded field still in bloom. General swathing is not expected for another 10 days. In the Peace, most areas report some swathing of early seeded fields, with the Falher-High Prairie area being slightly behind the rest of the Peace. Many fields of Polish varieties have been swathed. High temperatures in the Peace this past week have advanced crop development rapidly. The varying stages of crop development are complicating decisions regarding time of swathing. Moisture remains adequate to excessive across most areas, but dry areas persist in parts of central Saskatchewan, east central Alberta near Coronation and Hanna and the north Peace.
For current moisture condition maps across western Canada, visit this PFRA page:
http://www.agr.gc.ca/pfra/drought/drprec7_e.htm
The latest crop report from Manitoba Agriculture, Food & Rural Initiatives is available at:
http://web2.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/mwcr/index.php
The latest crop report from Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food & Rural Revitalization is available at:
http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/docs/reports/crop_report/crprpt040816.pdf
The latest monthly crop report from Alberta Agriculture, Food & Rural Development is available at:
http://www.gov.ab.ca/acn/200408/
1693142EFA7B8-1E67-4461-B49D4EDFDF7B8E8B.html

Additional moisture information for Alberta is available from Alberta Environment at:
http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/water/WS/data/precipmaps/weekly.pdf

Frost has been reported in areas east of Vegreville, AB. The amount of damage will depend on numerous factors including the degree and length of frost, relative humidity, presence of rain or dew, and crop stage. Wait for several days before determining the amount of damage, especially on the immature seeds and pods. For more information on the impact of frost, refer to the following link:
http://www.canola-council.org/stress_frost.aspx

Spraying for bertha armyworm larvae continues in the central Peace near Wanham and Eaglesham and in the north Peace near Lacrete. Flea beetles continue to be reported in the Fairview and Hines Creek areas of the Peace, as well as from Manitoba near Swan Lake, where some pod stripping has been reported. Although no economic thresholds exist for fall populations, use the fall flea beetle numbers as an indicator of potential risk for the upcoming season. If pod stripping becomes severe, increased shattering may result, so consider earlier swathing to reduce flea beetle feeding. Reducing insect damage may override potential yield losses from early swathing. Grasshopper activity has been reported in drier areas of western Saskatchewan where spraying of field margins has taken place. One case of diamondback moth larvae in the field margins has been reported near Andrew, Alberta. Increasing levels of lygus bugs (up to 10-20 per sweep) continue to be reported in southern Alberta and the Peace near Fairview. There are concerns about crop damage from lygus, but growers need to carefully assess crop stage before considering insecticide application. In some cases, there may not be an adequate pre-harvest interval for insecticide application, and growers may be better off to advance their time of swathing to reduce lygus damage. Use a sweep net to determine lygus pressure. Economic thresholds may vary from 30 to 50 lygus in a 10-sweep sample. However, be aware of the lygus stage. If a large number of nymphs are very small (aphid-sized), wait a week and sample again. The larger the lygus, the higher the potential damage. Firm seed will result in less damage than watery, immature seed. Also sample in the good areas of the field as higher numbers will be found in poor or thin areas. "Sap spots" are also a good indicator of lygus damage. A sweep net cannot be used for determining thresholds for diamondback moth, bertha armyworm, beet webworm or alfalfa looper larvae. An estimation of the number of these larvae within a square meter is a more accurate method of determining if thresholds for these insects have been exceeded.

For more background information on bertha armyworm moth monitoring, check this AAFRD sample map and discussion of how to interpret the moth counts at:
http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/prm2526?opendocument
The current bertha armyworm moth map can be found at:
http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/prm2521
For current trap count information in Saskatchewan, visit this page:
http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/docs/crops/
integrated_pest_management/insects/berthamap0107.asp

Fusarium wilt has been reported in fields near Vegreville, AB as well as in Saskatchewan from Wadena to Kamsack. Classic premature ripening symptoms have been reported in some of the Saskatchewan incidences. For more information on identifying fusarium wilt, visit this page:
http://www.canola-council.org/fusarium.aspx

Sclerotinia continues to be reported in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and southern and central Alberta. For assistance in identifying diseased plants, refer to the following page:
http://www.canola-council.org/sclerotiniasymptoms.aspx

As the crop completes pod development, be vigilant in the frequency and intensity of field scouting. Watch for abnormal areas that have wilted or prematurely ripening plants within canola stands that are otherwise healthy. These areas may be indicators of diseases such as fusarium wilt, sclerotinia, blackleg and clubroot that restrict water and nutrient uptake by plants. When scouting fields, be aware of what is causing the damage and properly document the information for future reference and decision-making. Scout for insects, diseases and nutrient deficiencies since these will become more evident as the crop matures. Pay close attention to misses, corners and overlaps or check strips to help determine if the fertility plan worked, and to help make important fertility decisions in the upcoming season.

Although swathing has started in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan on Argentine canola, and on Polish canola in the Peace region, most other areas are 10 to 21 days from swathing. Premature swathing has been reported in Manitoba, southern Saskatchewan and southern Alberta. Although the crop is behind in many areas and the risk of potential frost damage increases with each passing day, resist the urge to swath early. In the past year, time of swathing recommendations have been changed to reflect research results obtained after several years of Canola Council Canola Production Centre trials. Recent research indicates that the optimum stage to swath for both yield and quality is up to 60% seed colour change. This enables many growers to start swathing at 30% to 40% seed colour change without sacrificing significant yield or quality. It widens the "swathing days" window for all growers, including those with large canola acreages. When conditions are hot (30°C) and dry, avoid swathing. Swath during the cool evening hours, at night or early morning to allow plants to dry down at a slower rate. This reduces the chance of green seed. If conditions are cool, it is late in the season, and frost is forecast, consider swathing as early as 10% seed colour change to minimize green seed. Refer to the following link for more information on frost dates for various locations:
http://www.canola-council.org/stress_frost.aspx
Refer to the following risk maps for the average date for fall frosts in Manitoba:
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/climate/waa50s00fig5.html
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/climate/waa50s00fig6.html
http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/climate/waa50s00fig7.html

The colour of mature plants and pods will vary between varieties as they mature. Some will appear ripe on the outside before the seeds are mature. Seed colour is more important than the overall plant/pod colour when determining the stage of maturity. When assessing seed colour, also check seed firmness. Under cool conditions, seeds near the top of the plant may continue to fill and become firm before the lower seeds begin to turn colour. This type of field would be a much better candidate for earlier swathing than one where seed colour change is beginning to occur on the lower pods, but seeds in the upper pods and side branches remain mushy or translucent. Also, be conscious of disease-infected or hail-damaged fields, and do not let the premature ripening of the diseased or damaged plants influence the time of swathing. Realize that the bulk of the yield is likely still coming from the healthy plants and a better strategy to capture more yield than swathing early is to swath during dew periods to prevent shattering of the damaged plants. To learn more about proper field assessment, refer to the revised Canola Council publication "Canola Time of Swathing Guide" or visit the Canola Council page:
http://www.canola-council.org/pub_swathing.html

With swath stage approaching, consider a valuable weed control tool for next year’s crop--pre-harvest glyphosate. It’s the most consistent and effective treatment for many perennial weeds, providing an effective and economical alternative to in-crop control options. In early fall, perennial weeds are moving nutrients down into roots and rhizomes to prepare for winter. This period is when they are most vulnerable to herbicide translocation to the roots and better control is possible. Here’s the level of weed control the year after pre-harvest glyphosate for several perennial weed species:

  • quackgrass and toadflax--very good (>90%);
  • Canada thistle, dandelion and perennial sow thistle--good (>85 %); and
  • field horsetail -- fair (suppression only).

If a Roundup Ready canola variety has been grown, a pre-harvest application will assist in some dry down of green weeds and offer perennial weed control, but it will not dry down the crop. Apply when the crop has 30% or less moisture content. At this stage, the pods are green to yellow and most seeds have turned from green to yellow or brown. Wait three full days (72 hours) after application before swathing to allow thorough translocation of the herbicide to ensure extended long-term weed control. Do not use pre-harvest glyphosate on canola seed crops.

There are some questions regarding the use of Reglone (diquat) or glyphosate to speed up and even out crop development. However, remember that application of either product results in eventual killing of the plant. Application of either product too early will cause similar problems to swathing too early, with the additional possibility of increased herbicide residues in the crop. Be diligent in following label directions for product application timing.


Direct questions regarding this overall report to John Mayko, Agronomic Research & Extension Manager with the Canola Council of Canada at maykoj@canola-council.org or ph/fax: 780-764-2593.

For specific questions regarding regional issues associated with this report, consult one of the following Canola Council of Canada regional agronomists or provincial oilseed specialists;

For specific questions regarding regional issues associated with this report, please consult one of the following Canola Council of Canada regional agronomists or provincial oilseed specialists;

Derwyn Hammond, Agronomist, Manitoba,
hammondd@canola-council.org, 204-729-9011

Rob Park, Manitoba Agriculture & Food,
rpark@gov.mb.ca, 204-745-5665

David Vanthuyne, Agronomist, Eastern Saskatchewan,
vanthuyd@canola-council.org, 306-782-7799

David Blais, Agronomist, Western Saskatchewan,
blaisd@canola-council.org, 306-895-2122

Jim Bessel, Senior Agronomist, Northeastern Saskatchewan,
besselj@canola-council.org, 306-373-6771

Bill Greuel, Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food & Rural Revitalization,
wgreuel@agr.gov.sk.ca, 306-787-2756

Doug Moisey, Agronomist, Central Alberta,
moiseyd@canola-council.org, 780-645-3624

Christine Mardell, Agronomist, Peace River Region,
mardellc@canola-council.org, 780-518-1513

Nancy Muchka-Dahl, Agronomist, Southern Alberta,
muchkan@canola-council.org,, 403-625-3406

Murray Hartman, Alberta Agriculture, Food & Rural Development,
murray.hartman@gov.ab.ca, 403-782-8024

Kerry Clark, BC Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Fisheries,
Kerry.Clark@gems9.gov.bc.ca, 250-787-3213

The Canola Watch Report provides just-in-time information on canola production to growers and industry. Contributors to the Canola Agronomy Network are: Manitoba Agriculture & Food; Manitoba Canola Growers Association; Agricore United; Cargill; Saskatchewan Wheat Pool; United Farmers of Alberta; Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food & Rural Revitalization; Saskatchewan Canola Growers Association; Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission; Alberta Agriculture, Food & Rural Development; Alberta Canola Producers Commission; BC Ministry of Agriculture; Food & Fisheries; and the Canola Council of Canada.


« back